Our Digital Gems is getting an upgrade! Stay tuned to the NUS Libraries website for this and other announcements as we implement improvements to enhance your experience. Please note that saved bookmarks and links made to specific materials within Digital Gems will be affected, so remember to update them once the new system is live.

Title

Year

Author

Document 5/4—Pierre Bonnet's Proposal Regarding the Spelling to be Adopted for a Word for which more than One Spelling is in Use.

Document 5/4—Pierre Bonnet's Proposal Regarding the Spelling to be Adopted for a Word for which more than One Spelling is in Use.

Document 5/5—Comment Upon Pierre Bonnet's Proposition No. 10.

Document 5/5—Comment Upon Pierre Bonnet's Proposition No. 10.

Document 5/6—Proposals in a Report by a Sub-Committee of the Smithsonian Institution Committee on Zoological Nomenclature Published in July 1948.

Document 5/6—Proposals in a Report by a Sub-Committee of the Smithsonian Institution Committee on Zoological Nomenclature Published in July 1948.

Document 5/7—Comment on the Proposals Brought Forward by a Sub-Committee of the Smithsonian Institution Committee on Zoological Nomenclature in 1948.

Document 5/7—Comment on the Proposals Brought Forward by a Sub-Committee of the Smithsonian Institution Committee on Zoological Nomenclature in 1948.

Document 5/8—On the Principles which should Govern the Spelling of Names.

Document 5/8—On the Principles which should Govern the Spelling of Names.

Document 5/9—Letter Dated 28th February 1951

Document 5/9—Letter Dated 28th February 1951

Document 50/1—Proposal of Homonymy with the Consonantal "i" at the Consonantal Letters "j" and "yi". Enclosure to a Letter Dated 16th March 1949 from Hobart M. Smith

Document 50/1—Proposal of Homonymy with the Consonantal "i" at the Consonantal Letters "j" and "yi". Enclosure to a Letter Dated 16th March 1949 from Hobart M. Smith

Document 50/1—Proposed Revision of Certain Entries in Part B of Table 2 in the Appendix to Article 28

Document 50/1—Proposed Revision of Certain Entries in Part B of Table 2 in the Appendix to Article 28

Document 51/1—Dr. Helen Muir-Wood's Request for a Clarification of the Provisions in Article 20 Relating to the Use of Diacritic Marks in Relation to the Law of Homonymy

Document 51/1—Dr. Helen Muir-Wood's Request for a Clarification of the Provisions in Article 20 Relating to the Use of Diacritic Marks in Relation to the Law of Homonymy

Document 51/1—Proposed Adoption of a Recommendation that, where a Specific Name is Based on a Modern Patronymic, it should be Formed as a Substantive in the Genitive Case if the Purpose is to Honour the Collector of the Type Material and as an Adjective in Other Cases

Document 51/1—Proposed Adoption of a Recommendation that, where a Specific Name is Based on a Modern Patronymic, it should be Formed as a Substantive in the Genitive Case if the Purpose is to Honour the Collector of the Type Material and as an Adjective in Other Cases

Loading more items please wait...

All items are loaded.

Error loading more items. Please reload the page an try again.