Document 52/1—Proposal by Francis Hemming

Document 52/1—Proposed Insertion in the Regles of a Provision Invalidating Names Given to Species and Taxa of Lower Rank where the Holotype, Syntypes or Lectotypes are not Placed in a Public Institution

Document 52/2—Objection to the Insertion in the Regles of a Provision for the Compulsory Deposit of Type Material in Public Institutions

Document 53/1—Dr. Helen Muir-Wood's Proposal in Regard to the Treatment to be Accorded Under the Law of Homonymy to Names Differing from one Another in Spelling only by Reason of the Adoption of Different Methods for Transliterating a Word from the Cyrillic, or Some Other Alphabet into the Latin Alphabet

Document 53/1—Request for a Ruling that Any Two Generic Names or Trivial Names in the Same Genus, Each Based Upon a Word Transliterated into the Latin Alphabet from a Language using Another Alphabet but Differing from One Another in the Transliteration Used, be Treated as Homonyms of one Another

Document 53/2—Comments on Certain Points Raised by Professor Teiso Esaki in Regard to the Position in Relation to Homonymy of Certain Names Consisting of variant Spellings of Geographic Terms

Document 53/2—Letter Dated 6th September 1953 by Henning Lemche

Document 53/3—Request for a Ruling that Any Two Generic Names or Trivial Names in the Same Genus, Each Based Upon a Word Transliterated into the Latin Alphabet from a Language Using Another Alphabet but Differing from One Another in the Transliteration Used, be Treated as Homonyms of one Another

Document 54/1—Information Regarding the Acceptability of Certain Terminations for the Names of Tribes and Superfamilies Furnished to the Copenhagen Congress of 1953 by Leonard P. Schultz (Washington)

Document 54/1—Proposal by Francis Hemming