Document 6/3—Proposals Relating to the Specimen which should be Accepted in Certain Circumstances as the Type Specimen of a Species to which a Substitute Name is Given.

Document 6/4—Request for a Ruling on the Interpretation to be Given to the Name Ptinus tectus Boieldieu 1856, a Name Published Partly for Certain Specimens and Partly as a Substitute Name for a Previously Published Name

Document 6/5—The Application to be Given to a Trivial Name which, when First Published, was Both Applied to a Particular Species or to Particular Specimens and also Stated to be a Substitute Name for Some Previously Published Trivial Name or is Clearly Implied to be such a Substitute

Document 6/6—The Application of a Trivial Name which, when First Published, is Applied to a Particular Species or Specimen, but which is Stated also to be a Substitute Name for Some Previously Published Name

Document 6/7—Reply to Questionnaire, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 7: 127—130

Document 6/8—Substitute Names

Document 6/9—Statement by Th. Haltenorth

Document 60/1—Report on Communications Received since the Copenhagen (1953) Congress on the Question of the Practicability of Inserting Additional Letters in Words in Place of the Use of Diacritic Marks

Document 60/1—Statement Furnished by the Nomenclature Committee of the American Museum Of Natural History, New York. Enclosure to a Letter Dated 18th July 1952 from Ernst Mayr

Document 61/1—Criticisms of the Style and Content of the English Draft of the Regles